Investigative Forensic ToolKit Usage and Determinants of Adoption Behavior among Police Personnel

Main Article Content

Virendra Nirban
Umesh Mishra

Abstract

Technology has become integral to personal and professional spheres in the last two decades. There has been an unprecedented and rapid innovation in technology artifacts and their use for development and empowerment. Similarly, technology has been a part of governance for a long time. The basic objective of this paper is to understand the technology adoption behavior of police personnel in Rajasthan, India, and to identify factors that determine the technology adoption behavior of police personnel. The study's goals are not only to advance theory on the relationship between technology and policing but also a) to understand the technology adoption behavior of police personnel in Rajasthan, India, and b) to identify factors that determine the technology adoption behavior of the police personnel. In pursuit of the above goals, the focus was mainly on technologies significant for policing. For this study, the Forensic Toolkit has been taken as the technology artifact. The quantitative method has been used in the study for data collection. Descriptive and Inferential statistics have been used in the paper for analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nirban, V., & Mishra, U. (2024). Investigative Forensic ToolKit Usage and Determinants of Adoption Behavior among Police Personnel. Mind and Society, 13(02), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-132-20246
Section
Empirical Article

References

Ackroyd, S., Harper, R., Hughes, J.A., Shapiro, D. & Soothill K. 1992, New Technology and Practical Police Work , Open University Press, Buckingham.

Bellamy, C. (2011), “Alive and well? The ‘surveillance society’ and the coalition”, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 149-155.

George AvalosContra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, Calif.) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. https://www.govtech.com/dc/police-use-new-technologies-to-fight-crime.html

Grabosky, P.N. 1998. ‘Crime and Technology in The Global Village’, Paper presented at the conference: Internet Crime held in Melbourne, 16-18 February1998, by the Australian Institute of Criminology.

Hickman, M. and Atherley, L. (2012). Police Use of Force in Seattle, January 2009–March 2011. Northwest Justice Solutions.

Higgins, E. M., & Rolfe, S. M. (2017). “The sleeping army”: Necropolitics and the collateral consequences of being a sex offender. Deviant behavior, 38(9), 975-990.

Koper, C.S., Lum, C., & Willis, J.J. (2014). Realizing the potential of technology for policing. Translational Criminology (The Magazine of the Center for EvidenceBased Crime Policy, George Mason University), Fall 2014, 9-10, 17.

Manning, P.K. (2018). The Technology of Policing: Crime Mapping, Information Technology, and The Rationality of Crime Control. New York. New York University Press

Manning, Peter. (2003). Policing Contingencies. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226503523.001.0001.

Mitra, A. Cyber Crime and the Police: Insinuations to the Police Commissionerate of Bhubaneswar and Cuttack published in Orissa Law Review (2012) pp. 52 – 57.

Orlikowski, W.J. & Gash, D.C. 1994, ‘Technological Frames — Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations’, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, ,12(2), 174–207.

Venkatesh, Viswanath; Morris, Michael G.; Davis, Gordon B.; Davis, Fred D. (2003). "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View". MIS Quarterly. 27 (3): 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540. JSTOR 30036540.